↓ Skip to main content

Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jammbe Z Musoro, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Milo A Puhan, Gerben ter Riet, Ronald B Geskus

Abstract

In prognostic studies, the lasso technique is attractive since it improves the quality of predictions by shrinking regression coefficients, compared to predictions based on a model fitted via unpenalized maximum likelihood. Since some coefficients are set to zero, parsimony is achieved as well. It is unclear whether the performance of a model fitted using the lasso still shows some optimism. Bootstrap methods have been advocated to quantify optimism and generalize model performance to new subjects. It is unclear how resampling should be performed in the presence of multiply imputed data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 29%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Mathematics 7 6%
Computer Science 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 36 29%
Unknown 31 25%