↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcome and cost of treatment and care for neonates less than 1000 grams admitted to Vali-e ASR Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical outcome and cost of treatment and care for neonates less than 1000 grams admitted to Vali-e ASR Hospital
Published in
Health Economics Review, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13561-014-0021-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hosein Dalili, Mohaddese Fallahi, Saeid Moradi, Fatemeh Nayeri, Mamak Shariat, Arash Rashidian

Abstract

The aim of this study is to estimate the cost of care and treatment for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates admitted to a teaching and referral hospital. This cost estimation project can help health policy makers and planners make decisions and develop plans for perinatal service staging programs and better management of NICUs (Neonatal Intensive Care Units).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#331
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,633
of 255,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.