↓ Skip to main content

Five teacher profiles in student-centred curricula based on their conceptions of learning and teaching

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Five teacher profiles in student-centred curricula based on their conceptions of learning and teaching
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna CG Jacobs, Scheltus J van Luijk, Francisca Galindo-Garre, Arno MM Muijtjens, Cees PM van der Vleuten, Gerda Croiset, Fedde Scheele

Abstract

Teachers' conceptions of learning and teaching are partly unconscious. However, they are critical for the delivery of education and affect students' learning outcomes. Lasting changes in teaching behaviour can only be realized if conceptions of teachers have been changed accordingly. Previously we constructed a questionnaire named COLT to measure conceptions. In the present study, we investigated if different teacher profiles could be assessed which are based on the teachers' conceptions. These teacher profiles might have implications for individual teachers, for faculty development activities and for institutes. Our research questions were: (1) Can we identify teacher profiles based on the COLT? (2) If so, how are these teacher profiles associated with other teacher characteristics?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Lecturer 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 41 29%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 27%
Social Sciences 31 22%
Psychology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,324,383
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,065
of 3,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,590
of 255,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#18
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.