↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of reverse remodeling predicted by myocardial deformation on tissue tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of reverse remodeling predicted by myocardial deformation on tissue tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12968-017-0392-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-won Hwang, Sung Mok Kim, Sung-Ji Park, Eun Jeong Cho, Eun Kyoung Kim, Sung-A Chang, Sang-Chol Lee, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Seung Woo Park

Abstract

The technique of tissue tracking with balanced steady-state free precession cine sequences was introduced, and allowed myocardial strain to be derived directly, offering advantages over traditional myocardial tagging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between reverse remodeling as an outcome and left ventricular strain using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) tissue tracking, and to evaluate prediction of reverse remodeling by myocardial deformation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We enrolled 63 patients with severe AS and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction > 60%), who underwent both CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (Echo) before surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). CMR at 1.5 T, including non and post-contrast T1 mapping for extracellular volume (ECV), was carried out to define the amount of myocardial fibrosis. Cardiac Performance Analysis software was used to derive myocardial deformation as strain parameters from three short-axis cine views (basal, mid and apical levels) and apical 2, 3, and 4 chamber views. The primary outcome was reverse remodeling, as evaluated by regression of left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Median follow-up was 28.8 months (interquartile range 11.3-38.3 months). As evaluated by LVMI between baseline and follow-up, mass regression was significantly improved after AVR (baseline 145.9 ± 37.0 [g/m(2)] vs. follow-up 97.7 ± 22.2[g/m(2)], p < 0.001). Statistically significant Pearson's correlations with LVMI regression were observed for longitudinal global strain (r = -0.461, p < 0.001), radial strain (r = 0.391, p = 0.002), and circumferential strain (r = -0.334, p = 0.009). A simple linear regression analysis showed that all strain parameters could predict the amount of LVMI regression (P < 0.05), as well as non-contrast T1 value (beta = -0.314, p < 0.001) and ECV (beta = -2.546, p = 0.038). However, ECV had the lowest predictive power (multiple r(2) = 0.071). Multiple regression analysis showed strain could independently predict the amount of LVMI regression and the longitudinal global strain (beta = -3.335, p < 0.001). Longitudinal global strain measured by CMR tissue tracking as a technique was correlated with reverse remodeling as LVMI regression and was predictive of this outcome. As a simple and practical method, tissue tracking is promising to assess strain and predict reverse remodeling in severe AS, especially in patients with suboptimal Echo image quality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 18%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,554,464
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#451
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,987
of 339,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.