↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Haemostasis in patients undergoing emergent neurosurgery by rotational Elastometry and standard coagulation tests: a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Haemostasis in patients undergoing emergent neurosurgery by rotational Elastometry and standard coagulation tests: a prospective observational study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12871-017-0440-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Ellenberger, Najia Garofano, Gleicy Barcelos, John Diaper, Gordana Pavlovic, Marc Licker

Abstract

Rotational elastometry (ROTEM) has been shown useful to monitor coagulation in trauma patients and in major elective surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the utility of ROTEM to identify hemostatic disturbances and to predict the need for transfusion, compared with standard coagulation tests (SCTs) in patients undergoing emergent neurosurgery. Over a four-year period, adult patients who met criteria for emergent neurosurgery lasting more than 90 min were included in the study. Blood was collected preoperatively and analyzed with SCTs (international normalized ratio [INR], fibrinogen concentration, prothrombin time [PT or Quick], partial thromboplastine time [PTT], fibrinogen concentration and platelet count), and ROTEM assays. Correlations between SCTs and ROTEM parameters as well as receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to detect a coagulopathic pattern based on standard criteria and the need for transfusing at least 3 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs). In a cohort of 92 patients, 39 (42%) required ≥3 PRBCs and a coagulopathic pattern was identified in 32 patients based on SCTs and in 19 based on ROTEM. There was a strong correlation between PTT and INTEM coagulation time (R = 0.76) as well as between fibrinogen concentrations and FIBTEM maximal clot firmess (R = 0.70). The need for transfusion (≥ 3 PRBCs) was best predicted by the maximal clot firmess of EXTEM and FIBTEM (AUC of 0.72 and 0.71, respectively) and by fibrinogen concentration (AUC of 0.70). In patients undergoing emergent neurosurgery, ROTEM analysis provides valid markers of early coagulopathy and predictors of blood transfusion requirements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 39%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,970,125
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#268
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,125
of 327,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.