↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 tweeters
patent
53 patents
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10087 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4524 Mendeley
citeulike
68 CiteULike
connotea
12 Connotea

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Twitter Patents Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2004
DOI 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80
Pubmed ID
15461798
Authors

Robert C Gentleman, Vincent J Carey, Douglas M Bates, Ben Bolstad, Marcel Dettling, Sandrine Dudoit, Byron Ellis, Laurent Gautier, Yongchao Ge, Jeff Gentry, Kurt Hornik, Torsten Hothorn, Wolfgang Huber, Stefano Iacus, Rafael Irizarry, Friedrich Leisch, Cheng Li, Martin Maechler, Anthony J Rossini, Gunther Sawitzki, Colin Smith, Gordon Smyth, Luke Tierney, Jean YH Yang, Jianhua Zhang

Abstract

The Bioconductor project is an initiative for the collaborative creation of extensible software for computational biology and bioinformatics. The goals of the project include: fostering collaborative development and widespread use of innovative software, reducing barriers to entry into interdisciplinary scientific research, and promoting the achievement of remote reproducibility of research results. We describe details of our aims and methods, identify current challenges, compare Bioconductor to other open bioinformatics projects, and provide working examples.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 108 2%
United Kingdom 44 <1%
Germany 37 <1%
Spain 21 <1%
Brazil 18 <1%
France 17 <1%
Netherlands 14 <1%
India 13 <1%
Denmark 11 <1%
Other 127 3%
Unknown 4114 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1139 25%
Researcher 1034 23%
Student > Master 560 12%
Student > Bachelor 315 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 259 6%
Other 780 17%
Unknown 437 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1931 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 782 17%
Computer Science 307 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 295 7%
Engineering 102 2%
Other 532 12%
Unknown 575 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#705,666
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#501
of 4,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,088
of 133,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#3
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.