You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners’ scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Yeates, Katherine Woolf, Emyr Benbow, Ben Davies, Mairhead Boohan, Kevin Eva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 36% |
| Australia | 6 | 13% |
| South Africa | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 51% |
| Scientists | 13 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,153,269
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#814
of 4,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,371
of 339,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.