You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of a universal health-promoting parenting program: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial of All Children in Focus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malin Ulfsdotter, Pia Enebrink, Lene Lindberg |
| Abstract |
Parenting programs have been highlighted as a way of supporting and empowering parents. As programs designed to promote children's health and well-being are scarce, a new health-promotion program, All Children in Focus, has been developed. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the potential effectiveness of the program in promoting parental self-efficacy and child health and development, as well as to investigate possible moderators of these outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,663,231
of 24,758,493 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,116
of 16,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,002
of 264,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#53
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,758,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.