You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What do bereaved parents want from professionals after the sudden death of their child: a systematic review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-14-269 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanna Garstang, Frances Griffiths, Peter Sidebotham |
Abstract |
The death of a child is a devastating event for parents. In many high income countries, following an unexpected death, there are formal investigations to find the cause of death as part of wider integrated child death review processes. These processes have a clear aim of establishing the cause of death but it is less clear how bereaved families are supported. In order to inform better practice, a literature review was undertaken to identify what is known about what bereaved parents want from professionals following an unexpected child death. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 32 | 24% |
Unknown | 29 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 20% |
Psychology | 18 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,940,215
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#589
of 3,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,734
of 260,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.