↓ Skip to main content

Authors’ response to comments from Nachman KE et al.

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Authors’ response to comments from Nachman KE et al.
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0611-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette M. O’Connor, Brent W. Auvermann, Rungano S. Dzikamunhenga, Julie M. Glanville, Julian P. T. Higgins, Shelley P. Kirychuk, Jan M. Sargeant, Sarah C. Totton, Hannah Wood, Susanna G. Von Essen

Abstract

Authors' response to comments letter to the editor from Nachman KE et al.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 8 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#10,686,763
of 12,050,803 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#864
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,858
of 284,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#88
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,050,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.