You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: how can efforts be improved?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1087 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gemma Carey, Brad Crammond, Robyn Keast |
| Abstract |
The evidence base for the impact of social determinants of health has been strengthened considerably in the last decade. Increasingly, the public health field is using this as a foundation for arguments and actions to change government policies. The Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach, alongside recommendations from the 2010 Marmot Review into health inequalities in the UK (which we refer to as the 'Fairness Agenda'), go beyond advocating for the redesign of individual policies, to shaping the government structures and processes that facilitate the implementation of these policies. In doing so, public health is drawing on recent trends in public policy towards 'joined up government', where greater integration is sought between government departments, agencies and actors outside of government. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 14 | 18% |
| Australia | 13 | 16% |
| Spain | 6 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 18% |
| Scientists | 12 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 28% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 17% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#677,455
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#678
of 17,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,081
of 273,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.