↓ Skip to main content

Large proportion of genes in one cryptic WO prophage genome are actively and sex-specifically transcribed in a fig wasp species

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large proportion of genes in one cryptic WO prophage genome are actively and sex-specifically transcribed in a fig wasp species
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-893
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guan-Hong Wang, Li-Ming Niu, Guang-Chang Ma, Jin-Hua Xiao, Da-Wei Huang

Abstract

Cryptic prophages are genetically defective in their induction and propagation, and are simply regarded as genetic remnants. There are several putative cryptic WO prophages in the sequenced Wolbachia genomes. Whether they are lytic is unclear and their functions are poorly understood. Only three open reading frames (ORFs) in cryptic WO prophages have been reported to be actively transcribed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Researcher 7 29%
Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,173,560
of 23,343,453 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,668
of 10,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,024
of 257,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#142
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,343,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.