↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol: patient reported outcomes for bladder management strategies in spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol: patient reported outcomes for bladder management strategies in spinal cord injury
Published in
BMC Urology, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12894-017-0286-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darshan P. Patel, Sara M. Lenherr, John T. Stoffel, Sean P. Elliott, Blayne Welk, Angela P. Presson, Amitabh Jha, Jeffrey Rosenbluth, Jeremy B. Myers, for the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group

Abstract

The majority of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have urinary issues, such as incontinence, retention, and frequency. These problems place a significant burden on patients' physical health and quality of life (QoL). There are a wide variety of bladder management strategies available to patients with no clear guidelines on appropriate selection. Inappropriate bladder management can cause hospitalizations and serious complications, such as urosepsis and renal failure. Patients believe that both independence and ability to carry out daily activities are just as important as physical health in selecting the right bladder-management strategy but little is known about patient's QoL with different bladder managements. Our study's aim is to assess patient reported QoL measures with various bladder managements after SCI. This manuscript describes the approach, study design and common data elements for our central study. This is a multi-institutional prospective cohort study comparing three different bladder-management strategies (clean intermittent catheterization, indwelling catheters, and surgery). Information collected from participants includes demographics, past medical and surgical history, injury characteristics, current and past bladder management, and SCI /bladder-related complications. Patient reported outcomes and QoL questionnaires were administered at enrollment and every 3 months for 1 year. Aims of this study protocol are: (1) to assess baseline QoL differences between the three different bladder-management strategies; (2) determine QoL impact when those using either form of catheter management undergo a surgery over the 1 year of follow-up among patients eligible for surgery; (3) assess the effects of changes in bladder management and complications on QoL over a 1-year longitudinal follow-up. By providing information about patient-reported outcomes associated with different bladder management strategies after SCI, and the impact of bladder management changes and complications on QoL, this study will provide essential information for shared decision-making and guide future investigation. Trial registration number: www.clinicaltrials.gov : Identifier: NCT0261608; U.S. National Library of Medicine, wwwcf.nlm.nih.gov : Identifier: HSRP20153564.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 30%