↓ Skip to main content

Double calcaneal osteotomy for severe adolescent flexible flatfoot reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Double calcaneal osteotomy for severe adolescent flexible flatfoot reconstruction
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0655-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Xu, Yong-xing Cao, Xing-chen Li, Yuan Zhu, Xiang-yang Xu

Abstract

The timing and strategy of treatment for flatfoot still remain controversial. It is a difficult problem when facing severe adolescent flexible flatfoot because a single procedure cannot realign flatfoot deformity effectively. We reviewed 13 adolescent flexible flatfoot patients who underwent double calcaneal osteotomy during May 2012 to June 2015. The mean age of patients was 15.2 ± 1.8 (range, 10-18) years. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot (AOFAS-AH) scores and SF-36 score were adopted to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative functions of the foot. Changes of hindfoot valgus angles, talonavicular uncoverage angles on AP view and talo-first metatarsal angles, and talar pitch angles and calcaneal pitch angles on the lateral film before and after surgery were measured. All 13 patients (15 ft) were followed. The mean duration of follow-up was 34.5 ± 15.7 (range, 21-60) months. The hindfoot valgus angle improved from 16.5 ± 4.1 to 2.9 ± 1.6. On the foot AP view, the mean preoperative and postoperative talonavicular coverage angles were 24.9 ± 8.5 and 6.5 ± 3.6. On the lateral view of the foot, the average preoperative and postoperative talo-first metatarsal angles were 18.1 ± 5.5 and 4.9 ± 4.4. The mean preoperative and postoperative talar pitch angles were 36.4 ± 4.7 and 24.0 ± 5.6. The AOFAS-AH score improved from 68.9 ± 12.3 preoperatively to 94.6 ± 3.9 postoperatively. With additional procedures, double calcaneal osteotomy was an effective method for severe adolescent flexible flatfoot.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#965
of 1,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,288
of 326,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.