↓ Skip to main content

Eating behaviour disorders among adolescents in a middle school in Dongfanghong, China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eating behaviour disorders among adolescents in a middle school in Dongfanghong, China
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40337-017-0175-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tingting Feng, Dawit Shawel Abebe

Abstract

Disordered eating behaviours (DEB) are significant public health challenges among adolescents. DEB are prevalent among Chinese young people and replication epidemiological studies in DEB are needed due to ongoing rapid modernization and socio-economic change. In addition, there has been no prevention or intervention programs for DEB in most of rural areas in China and research in DEB in rural China is limited. More research in DEB in rural China is needed for increased awareness of prevention strategies. The objectives of the study are to examine the prevalence and associated factors of DEB among rural Chinese adolescents. Four hundred and sixty-six students aged 11-18 years old from a middle school in rural China were invited to complete a self-reported questionnaire that included measures on DEB and psychosocial factors. The SCOFF questionnaire was applied to measure DEB (i.e., a score of > = 2 indicates a likely case of DEB). Logistic regression models were applied for data analyses. A p-value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. There were 389 adolescents (11-18 years) included in this study with the prevalence of DEB being 28.8%. No significant differences were found between male adolescents (30.5%) and female adolescents (27.1%). Independently, perceived overweight (OR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.05-7.48), negative affect (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.12), body dissatisfaction (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99), and watching TV (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.11-5.18) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with DEB. This study indicates a high prevalence rate of DEB among rural adolescents and associated factors of DEB from a school-based sample. Such findings imply that local public health systems should pay more attention to DEB and design prevention and intervention strategies for DEB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Psychology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 27 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,918,662
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#697
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,598
of 327,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.