↓ Skip to main content

Process evaluation of a multicomponent dyadic intervention study with exercise and support for people with dementia and their family caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Process evaluation of a multicomponent dyadic intervention study with exercise and support for people with dementia and their family caregivers
Published in
Trials, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna-Eva Prick, Jacomine de Lange, Netta van ‘t Leven, Anne Margriet Pot

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent dyadic intervention (a translated and adapted version of an intervention that has been shown to be effective for people with dementia in the USA) was performed. The exercise and support intervention was intended to reduce depressive symptoms of people with dementia and their caregivers. The purpose of this process evaluation is to create in-depth insight into the delivery of the intervention and the effect analysis, to prevent drawing inappropriate conclusions on the efficacy or effectiveness of the intervention, and to formulate recommendations for future studies on complex geriatric interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 273 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 73 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 54 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 18%
Psychology 46 17%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 81 29%