You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minimally invasive facet restoration implant for chronic lumbar zygapophysial pain: 1-year outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13022-014-0007-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans-Jörg Meisel, Konrad Seller, Achim Lüth, Karin Büttner-Janz, Peter Stosberg, Alexander Moser, Larry E Miller, Jon E Block, Luiz Pimenta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,113,765
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#2
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,622
of 258,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them