↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the effectiveness of the 0.018-inch versus the 0.022-inch bracket slot system in orthodontic treatment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the effectiveness of the 0.018-inch versus the 0.022-inch bracket slot system in orthodontic treatment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed MF El-Angbawi, David R Bearn, Grant T McIntyre

Abstract

Edgewise fixed orthodontic appliances are available in two different bracket slot sizes (0.018 and 0.022 inch). Both systems are used by clinicians worldwide with some orthodontists claiming the superiority and clinical advantages of one system over the other. However, the scientific evidence supporting this area is scarce and weak. This leaves the clinician's choice of bracket slot system to clinical preference. We aim to compare the 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch pre-adjusted bracket slot systems in terms of the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Postgraduate 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 43%
Unspecified 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 38 43%