↓ Skip to main content

Continuous glucose monitoring in neonates: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous glucose monitoring in neonates: a review
Published in
Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40748-017-0055-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J.D. McKinlay, J. Geoffrey Chase, Jennifer Dickson, Deborah L. Harris, Jane M. Alsweiler, Jane E. Harding

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is well established in the management of diabetes mellitus, but its role in neonatal glycaemic control is less clear. CGM has provided important insights about neonatal glucose metabolism, and there is increasing interest in its clinical use, particularly in preterm neonates and in those in whom glucose control is difficult. Neonatal glucose instability, including hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, has been associated with poorer neurodevelopment, and CGM offers the possibility of adjusting treatment in real time to account for individual metabolic requirements while reducing the number of blood tests required, potentially improving long-term outcomes. However, current devices are optimised for use at relatively high glucose concentrations, and several technical issues need to be resolved before real-time CGM can be recommended for routine neonatal care. These include: 1) limited point accuracy, especially at low or rapidly changing glucose concentrations; 2) calibration methods that are designed for higher glucose concentrations of children and adults, and not for neonates; 3) sensor drift, which is under-recognised; and 4) the need for dynamic and integrated metrics that can be related to long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. CGM remains an important tool for retrospective investigation of neonatal glycaemia and the effect of different treatments on glucose metabolism. However, at present CGM should be limited to research studies, and should only be introduced into routine clinical care once benefit is demonstrated in randomised trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 36%
Engineering 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 24 26%