↓ Skip to main content

Re-development of mental health first aid guidelines for non-suicidal self-injury: a Delphi study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-development of mental health first aid guidelines for non-suicidal self-injury: a Delphi study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0236-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna M Ross, Claire M Kelly, Anthony F Jorm

Abstract

BackgroundUp to 12% of Australian adults and almost one in five adolescents are estimated to have engaged in non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) at some time in their life. Friends and family are most likely to notice signs of NSSI, but may be unsure how to intervene. Mental health first aid guidelines were developed in 2008 on how to do this through providing initial support and encouraging appropriate professional help-seeking. This study aims to re-develop the 2008 NSSI first aid guidelines to ensure they contain current recommended helping actions and remain consistent with the NSSI intervention literature.MethodsThe Delphi consensus method was used to determine the importance of the inclusion of helping statements in the guidelines. These statements describe helping actions a member of the public can take, and information they should have, to help someone who is engaging in NSSI. Systematic searches of the available NSSI intervention literature were conducted to find helping statements. Two expert panels, comprising 28 NSSI professionals and 33 consumer advocates, rated the importance of each statement.Results98 out of 220 statements were endorsed as appropriate helping actions in providing assistance to someone engaging in NSSI. These statements were used to form the updated mental health first aid guidelines for NSSI.ConclusionThe re-development of the guidelines has resulted in more comprehensive guidance than the original version (98 versus 30 statements containing helping actions). This substantial increase in endorsed statements adds detail and depth to the guidelines, as well as covers additional ways of providing guidance and support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 40 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 30%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 43 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,411,155
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,683
of 5,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,174
of 239,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#59
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.