↓ Skip to main content

Emergency department diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in a patient with left atrial sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergency department diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in a patient with left atrial sarcoma
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12245-014-0032-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maricel Dela Cruz, Jeremy Seelinger Devey

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension is a disease with many etiologies and is responsible for 200,000 admissions and 25,000 hospitalizations in the United States each year. We report the case of a previously healthy 58-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with a months-long history of worsening dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Despite the severity of her symptoms, she had no corroborative physical exam findings, including jugular venous distension or peripheral edema. Bedside emergency department ultrasonography revealed a dilated right ventricle and bowing of the intraventricular septum into the left ventricle, consistent with pulmonary hypertension. CT angiography of the chest performed in the emergency department revealed a large left atrial mass, found on pathology to be a left atrial sarcoma. This case illustrates how severely symptomatic pulmonary hypertension can have few to no physical exam findings and the utility of bedside emergency department ultrasound in making the presumptive diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,730,142
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#502
of 598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,129
of 252,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.