You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remembering the forgotten non-communicable diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0200-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan D Lopez, Thomas N Williams, Adeera Levin, Marcello Tonelli, Jasvinder A Singh, Peter GJ Burney, Jürgen Rehm, Nora D Volkow, George Koob, Cleusa P Ferri |
| Abstract |
The forthcoming post-Millennium Development Goals era will bring about new challenges in global health. Low- and middle-income countries will have to contend with a dual burden of infectious and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Some of these NCDs, such as neoplasms, COPD, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, cause much health loss worldwide and are already widely recognised as doing so. However, 55% of the global NCD burden arises from other NCDs, which tend to be ignored in terms of premature mortality and quality of life reduction. Here, experts in some of these 'forgotten NCDs' review the clinical impact of these diseases along with the consequences of their ignoring their medical importance, and discuss ways in which they can be given higher global health priority in order to decrease the growing burden of disease and disability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 72 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,550,598
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,077
of 3,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,463
of 261,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#30
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.