You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intensive care unit delirium is an independent predictor of longer hospital stay: a prospective analysis of 261 non-ventilated patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc3729 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason WW Thomason, Ayumi Shintani, Josh F Peterson, Brenda T Pun, James C Jackson, E Wesley Ely |
| Abstract |
Delirium occurs in most ventilated patients and is independently associated with more deaths, longer stay, and higher cost. Guidelines recommend monitoring of delirium in all intensive care unit (ICU) patients, though few data exist in non-ventilated patients. The study objective was to determine the relationship between delirium and outcomes among non-ventilated ICU patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 43 | 13% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 93 | 29% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 202 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,864,045
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,454
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,127
of 68,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.