You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decreased duration of mechanical ventilation when comparing analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil with standard hypnotic-based sedation for up to 10 days in intensive care unit patients: a randomised trial [ISRCTN47583497]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc3495 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Des Breen, Andreas Karabinis, Manu Malbrain, Rex Morais, Sven Albrecht, Inge-Lise Jarnvig, Pauline Parkinson, Andrew JT Kirkham |
| Abstract |
This randomised, open-label, multicentre study compared the safety and efficacy of an analgesia-based sedation regime using remifentanil with a conventional hypnotic-based sedation regime in critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation for up to 10 days. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 26% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,101,910
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,922
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,671
of 76,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.