↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual framework and rationale

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptual framework and rationale
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-s2-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan S Robinson, Bart GJ Knols, Gabriella Voigt, Jorge Hendrichs

Abstract

The sterile insect technique (SIT) has been shown to be an effective and sustainable genetic approach to control populations of selected major pest insects, when part of area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programmes. The technique introduces genetic sterility in females of the target population in the field following their mating with released sterile males. This process results in population reduction or elimination via embryo lethality caused by dominant lethal mutations induced in sperm of the released males. In the past, several field trials have been carried out for mosquitoes with varying degrees of success. New technology and experience gained with other species of insect pests has encouraged a reassessment of the use of the sterility principle as part of integrated control of malaria vectors. Significant technical and logistic hurdles will need to be overcome to develop the technology and make it effective to suppress selected vector populations, and its application will probably be limited to specific ecological situations. Using sterile males to control mosquito vector populations can only be effective as part of an AW-IPM programme. The area-wide concept entails the targeting of the total mosquito population within a defined area. It requires, therefore, a thorough understanding of the target pest population biology especially as regards mating behaviour, population dynamics, dispersal and level of reproductive isolation. The key challenges for success are: 1) devising methods to monitor vector populations and measuring competitiveness of sterile males in the field, 2) designing mass rearing, sterilization and release strategies that maintain competitiveness of the sterile male mosquitoes, 3) developing methods to separate sexes in order to release only male mosquitoes and 4) adapting suppression measures and release rates to take into account the high reproductive rate of mosquitoes. Finally, success in area-wide implementation in the field can only be achieved if close attention is paid to political, socio-economic and environmental sensitivities and an efficient management organization is established taking into account the interests of all potential stakeholders of an AW-IPM programme.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 2%
France 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Madagascar 1 1%
Unknown 82 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 28%
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 46%
Environmental Science 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2010.
All research outputs
#5,605,367
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,006
of 4,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,374
of 238,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#105
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.