↓ Skip to main content

Decreased motivation in the use of insecticide-treated nets in a malaria endemic area in Burkina Faso

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decreased motivation in the use of insecticide-treated nets in a malaria endemic area in Burkina Faso
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Léa Paré Toé, Olé Skovmand, Kounbobr Roch Dabiré, Abdoulaye Diabaté, Yveline Diallo, Tinga Robert Guiguemdé, Julien Marie Christian Doannio, Martin Akogbeto, Thierry Baldet, Marc-Eric Gruénais

Abstract

The use of insecticide-treated nets (ITN) is an important tool in the Roll Back Malaria (RBM) strategy. For ITNs to be effective they need to be used correctly. Previous studies have shown that many factors, such as wealth, access to health care, education, ethnicity and gender, determine the ownership and use of ITNs. Some studies showed that free distribution and public awareness campaigns increased the rate of use. However, there have been no evaluations of the short- and long-term impact of such motivation campaigns. A study carried out in a malaria endemic area in south-western Burkina Faso indicated that this increased use declined after several months. The reasons were a combination of the community representation of malaria, the perception of the effectiveness and usefulness of ITNs and also the manner in which households are organized by day and by night.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 223 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 21%
Social Sciences 37 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 50 21%