↓ Skip to main content

Costs and cost-effectiveness of delivering intermittent preventive treatment through schools in western Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs and cost-effectiveness of delivering intermittent preventive treatment through schools in western Kenya
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-7-196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matilda Temperley, Dirk H Mueller, J Kiambo Njagi, Willis Akhwale, Siân E Clarke, Matthew CH Jukes, Benson BA Estambale, Simon Brooker

Abstract

Awareness of the potential impact of malaria among school-age children has stimulated investigation into malaria interventions that can be delivered through schools. However, little evidence is available on the costs and cost-effectiveness of intervention options. This paper evaluates the costs and cost-effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) as delivered by teachers in schools in western Kenya.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Kenya 2 2%
Bangladesh 1 1%
Botswana 1 1%
Unknown 89 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 23%
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Professor 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 25%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,731,815
of 23,506,136 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,513
of 5,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,404
of 90,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,136 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.