↓ Skip to main content

How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
Published in
Malaria Journal, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fred Matovu, Catherine Goodman, Virginia Wiseman, William Mwengee

Abstract

Studies show that the burden of malaria remains huge particularly in low-income settings. Although effective malaria control measures such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) have been promoted, relatively little is known about their equity dimension. Understanding variations in their use in low-income settings is important for scaling up malaria control programmes particularly ITNs. The objective of this paper is to measure the extent and causes of inequalities in the ownership and utilisation of bed nets across socioeconomic groups (SEGs) and age groups in Tanga District, north-eastern Tanzania.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Social Sciences 15 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 21 18%