↓ Skip to main content

Reviewing the literature on access to prompt and effective malaria treatment in Kenya: implications for meeting the Abuja targets

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reviewing the literature on access to prompt and effective malaria treatment in Kenya: implications for meeting the Abuja targets
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Chuma, Timothy Abuya, Dorothy Memusi, Elizabeth Juma, Willis Akhwale, Janet Ntwiga, Andrew Nyandigisi, Gladys Tetteh, Rima Shretta, Abdinasir Amin

Abstract

Effective case management is central to reducing malaria mortality and morbidity worldwide, but only a minority of those affected by malaria, have access to prompt effective treatment.In Kenya, the Division of Malaria Control is committed to ensuring that 80 percent of childhood fevers are treated with effective anti-malarial medicines within 24 hours of fever onset, but this target is largely unmet. This review aimed to document evidence on access to effective malaria treatment in Kenya, identify factors that influence access, and make recommendations on how to improve prompt access to effective malaria treatment. Since treatment-seeking patterns for malaria are similar in many settings in sub-Saharan Africa, the findings presented in this review have important lessons for other malaria endemic countries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Nigeria 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 137 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Lecturer 10 7%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 29%
Social Sciences 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 22 15%