You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Costs and effects of the Tanzanian national voucher scheme for insecticide-treated nets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-7-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo-Ann Mulligan, Joshua Yukich, Kara Hanson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,571
of 5,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,811
of 180,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.