↓ Skip to main content

Understanding disease mechanisms with models of signaling pathway activities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding disease mechanisms with models of signaling pathway activities
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12918-014-0121-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Sebastian-Leon, Enrique Vidal, Pablo Minguez, Ana Conesa, Sonia Tarazona, Alicia Amadoz, Carmen Armero, Francisco Salavert, Antonio Vidal-Puig, David Montaner, Joaquín Dopazo

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding the aspects of the cell functionality that account for disease or drug action mechanisms is one of the main challenges in the analysis of genomic data and is on the basis of the future implementation of precision medicine.ResultsHere we propose a simple probabilistic model in which signaling pathways are separated into elementary sub-pathways or signal transmission circuits (which ultimately trigger cell functions) and then transforms gene expression measurements into probabilities of activation of such signal transmission circuits. Using this model, differential activation of such circuits between biological conditions can be estimated. Thus, circuit activation statuses can be interpreted as biomarkers that discriminate among the compared conditions. This type of mechanism-based biomarkers accounts for cell functional activities and can easily be associated to disease or drug action mechanisms. The accuracy of the proposed model is demonstrated with simulations and real datasets.ConclusionsThe proposed model provides detailed information that enables the interpretation disease mechanisms as a consequence of the complex combinations of altered gene expression values. Moreover, it offers a framework for suggesting possible ways of therapeutic intervention in a pathologically perturbed system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 86 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 27%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Computer Science 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,830,249
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#189
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,706
of 261,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.