↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active Nepalese youths in the Kathmandu Valley

Overview of attention for article published in Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active Nepalese youths in the Kathmandu Valley
Published in
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40834-017-0040-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laxmi Tamang, Camille Raynes-Greenow, Kevin McGeechan, Kirsten Black

Abstract

In Nepal, evidence is sparse regarding the use of contraception at first and current relationships among sexually active young people. This study examined the factors associated with modern contraceptive use at first and current sexual relationships. A descriptive cross-sectional household survey conducted amongst young Nepalese men and women living in the urban areas of the Kathmandu valley. We used logistic regression to model the relationship between selected independent variables and outcome variables (use at first sexual intercourse and current use of modern contraception) among 492 ever sexually active youth aged 15-24 years. We found that the key factors associated with current non-use of modern contraceptives among sexually active youth age 15-24 were young age at first sexual contact and a relationship with someone other than a spouse, while significant factor associated with current use of contraception was religion, revealing that Hindu youths having lower odds of use compared to young people who belonged to other religions. The findings suggest that contraception education should be intensified and directly towards those entering adolescence to encourage youths to adopt contraception at the time of their first sexual relationship. The influence of religion on use of modern contraception needs further exploration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 49 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 51 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,228
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#77
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,691
of 307,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them