You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc9335 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mehrnaz Hadian, Hyung Kook Kim, Donald A Severyn, Michael R Pinsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 197 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 15% |
Other | 28 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
Other | 52 | 25% |
Unknown | 29 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 67% |
Engineering | 8 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | <1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Unknown | 41 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,575,286
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,958
of 6,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,646
of 194,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.