You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
A novel cognitive behaviour therapy for bipolar disorders (Think Effectively About Mood Swings or TEAMS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Warren Mansell, Sara Tai, Alexandra Clark, Savas Akgonul, Graham Dunn, Linda Davies, Heather Law, Richard Morriss, Neil Tinning, Anthony P Morrison |
| Abstract |
Existing psychological therapies for bipolar disorders have been found to have mixed results, with a consensus that they provide a significant, but modest, effect on clinical outcomes. Typically, these approaches have focused on promoting strategies to prevent future relapse. An alternative treatment approach, termed 'Think Effectively About Mood Swings' (TEAMS) addresses current symptoms, including subclinical hypomania, depression and anxiety, and promotes long-term recovery. Following the publication of a theoretical model, a range of research studies testing the model and a case series have demonstrated positive results. The current study reports the protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial to inform a future multi-centre trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 31% |