You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data access for the 1,000 Plants (1KP) project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-217x-3-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naim Matasci, Ling-Hong Hung, Zhixiang Yan, Eric J Carpenter, Norman J Wickett, Siavash Mirarab, Nam Nguyen, Tandy Warnow, Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam, Michael Barker, J Gordon Burleigh, Matthew A Gitzendanner, Eric Wafula, Joshua P Der, Claude W dePamphilis, Béatrice Roure, Hervé Philippe, Brad R Ruhfel, Nicholas W Miles, Sean W Graham, Sarah Mathews, Barbara Surek, Michael Melkonian, Douglas E Soltis, Pamela S Soltis, Carl Rothfels, Lisa Pokorny, Jonathan A Shaw, Lisa DeGironimo, Dennis W Stevenson, Juan Carlos Villarreal, Tao Chen, Toni M Kutchan, Megan Rolf, Regina S Baucom, Michael K Deyholos, Ram Samudrala, Zhijian Tian, Xiaolei Wu, Xiao Sun, Yong Zhang, Jun Wang, Jim Leebens-Mack, Gane Ka-Shu Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 377 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 29% |
| Researcher | 74 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 6% |
| Professor | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 201 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 88 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 72 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#582,598
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#54
of 1,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,140
of 273,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.