↓ Skip to main content

The effect of posterior and lateral approach on patient-reported outcome measures and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis, undergoing total hip replacement: a randomised controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of posterior and lateral approach on patient-reported outcome measures and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis, undergoing total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial protocol
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Signe Rosenlund, Leif Broeng, Carsten Jensen, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen, Søren Overgaard

Abstract

Total hip replacement provides pain relief and improves physical function and quality of life in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. The incidence of hip replacement operations is expected to increase due to the growing elderly population. Overall, the posterior approach and lateral approach are the two most commonly used approaches for hip replacement operations. The posterior approach is associated with an increased risk of revision due to dislocations, and some studies have shown that the lateral approach is associated with reduced patient-reported outcomes, including physical function and pain; however, this has not been investigated in a randomised controlled trial with a twelve-month follow-up. We hypothesized that the lateral approach has an inferior outcome in patient-reported outcome compared with the posterior approach after one year.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 185 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 60 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 66 35%