↓ Skip to main content

Improving the accuracy of expression data analysis in time course experiments using resampling

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the accuracy of expression data analysis in time course experiments using resampling
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12859-014-0352-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wencke Walter, Bernd Striberny, Emmanuel Gaquerel, Ian T Baldwin, Sang-Gyu Kim, Ines Heiland

Abstract

BackgroundAs time series experiments in higher eukaryotes usually obtain data from different individuals collected at the different time points, a time series sample itself is not equivalent to a true biological replicate but is, rather, a combination of several biological replicates. The analysis of expression data derived from a time series sample is therefore often performed with a low number of replicates due to budget limitations or limitations in sample availability. In addition, most algorithms developed to identify specific patterns in time series dataset do not consider biological variation in samples collected at the same conditions.ResultsUsing artificial time course datasets, we show that resampling considerably improves the accuracy of transcripts identified as rhythmic. In particular, the number of false positives can be greatly reduced while at the same time the number of true positives can be maintained in the range of other methods currently used to determine rhythmically expressed genes.ConclusionsThe resampling approach described here therefore increases the accuracy of time series expression data analysis and furthermore emphasizes the importance of biological replicates in identifying oscillating genes. Resampling can be used for any time series expression dataset as long as the samples are acquired from independent individuals at each time point.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 8%
Netherlands 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Uruguay 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
India 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 68%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 38%
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Computer Science 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#13,066,090
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,966
of 7,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,783
of 260,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#62
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.