↓ Skip to main content

Cancer symptom awareness and barriers to medical help seeking in Scottish adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer symptom awareness and barriers to medical help seeking in Scottish adolescents: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Hubbard, Iona Macmillan, Anne Canny, Liz Forbat, Richard D Neal, Ronan E O’Carroll, Sally Haw, Richard G Kyle

Abstract

Initiatives to promote early diagnosis include raising public awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer and addressing barriers to seeking medical help about cancer. Awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer and emotional barriers, such as fear, worry, and embarrassment, strongly influence help seeking behaviour. Whether anxiety influences seeking medical help about cancer is not known. The purpose of this study about adolescents was to examine: 1) the relationship between contextual factors and awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer and barriers (including emotional barriers) to seeking medical help, and 2) associations between anxiety and endorsed barriers to seeking medical help. Interpretation of data is informed by the common sense model of the self-regulation of health and illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Psychology 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,098,530
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,564
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,397
of 263,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#62
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.