↓ Skip to main content

Expression of endoglucanases in Pichia pastoris under control of the GAP promoter

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression of endoglucanases in Pichia pastoris under control of the GAP promoter
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2859-13-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anikó Várnai, Campbell Tang, Oskar Bengtsson, Andrew Atterton, Geir Mathiesen, Vincent GH Eijsink

Abstract

Plant-derived biomass is a potential alternative to fossil feedstocks for a greener economy. Enzymatic saccharification of biomass has been studied extensively and endoglucanases have been found to be a prerequisite for quick initial liquefaction of biomass under industrial conditions. Pichia pastoris, widely used for heterologous protein expression, can be utilized for fungal endoglucanase production. The recently marketed PichiaPink™ expression system allows for rapid clone selection, and employs the methanol inducible AOX1 promoter to ensure high protein expression levels. However, methanol is toxic and poses a fire hazard, issues which become more significant at an industrial scale. It is possible to eliminate these risks and still maintain high productivity by switching to the constitutive GAP promoter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 27%
Engineering 6 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#572
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,586
of 241,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.