You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How can we establish more successful knowledge networks in developing countries? Lessons learnt from knowledge networks in Iran
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Reza Majdzadeh, Ali Alami, Sima Amrolalaei |
| Abstract |
Formal knowledge networks are considered among the solutions for strengthening knowledge translation and one of the elements of innovative systems in developing and developed countries. In the year 2000, knowledge networks were established in Iran's health system to organize, lead, empower, and coordinate efforts made by health-related research centers in the country. Since the assessment of a knowledge network is one of the main requirements for its success, the current study was designed in two qualitative and quantitative sections to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the established knowledge networks and to assess their efficiency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,333,178
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#750
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,629
of 267,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.