↓ Skip to main content

Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms in Parkinson's disease: Targets for potential treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Neurodegeneration, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
354 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
961 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms in Parkinson's disease: Targets for potential treatments
Published in
Translational Neurodegeneration, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40035-017-0099-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panchanan Maiti, Jayeeta Manna, Gary L. Dunbar

Abstract

Gradual degeneration and loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, pars compacta and subsequent reduction of dopamine levels in striatum are associated with motor deficits that characterize Parkinson's disease (PD). In addition, half of the PD patients also exhibit frontostriatal-mediated executive dysfunction, including deficits in attention, short-term working memory, speed of mental processing, and impulsivity. The most commonly used treatments for PD are only partially or transiently effective and are available or applicable to a minority of patients. Because, these therapies neither restore the lost or degenerated dopaminergic neurons, nor prevent or delay the disease progression, the need for more effective therapeutics is critical. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the molecular signaling pathways involved in PD, particularly within the context of how genetic and environmental factors contribute to the initiation and progression of this disease. The involvement of molecular chaperones, autophagy-lysosomal pathways, and proteasome systems in PD are also highlighted. In addition, emerging therapies, including pharmacological manipulations, surgical procedures, stem cell transplantation, gene therapy, as well as complementary, supportive and rehabilitation therapies to prevent or delay the progression of this complex disease are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 961 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 961 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 175 18%
Student > Master 128 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 11%
Researcher 74 8%
Student > Postgraduate 35 4%
Other 116 12%
Unknown 326 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 174 18%
Neuroscience 124 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 66 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 6%
Other 117 12%
Unknown 354 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Translational Neurodegeneration
#304
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,412
of 338,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Neurodegeneration
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.