↓ Skip to main content

The protective role of estrogen and estrogen receptors in cardiovascular disease and the controversial use of estrogen therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Sex Differences, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 602)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
98 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
506 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
734 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The protective role of estrogen and estrogen receptors in cardiovascular disease and the controversial use of estrogen therapy
Published in
Biology of Sex Differences, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13293-017-0152-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Iorga, Christine M. Cunningham, Shayan Moazeni, Gregoire Ruffenach, Soban Umar, Mansoureh Eghbali

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have previously suggested that premenopausal females have reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) when compared to age-matched males, and the incidence and severity of CVD increases postmenopause. The lower incidence of cardiovascular disease in women during reproductive age is attributed at least in part to estrogen (E2). E2 binds to the traditional E2 receptors (ERs), estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), as well as the more recently identified G-protein-coupled ER (GPR30), and can exert both genomic and non-genomic actions. This review summarizes the protective role of E2 and its receptors in the cardiovascular system and discusses its underlying mechanisms with an emphasis on oxidative stress, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and vascular function. This review also presents the sexual dimorphic role of ERs in modulating E2 action in cardiovascular disease. The controversies surrounding the clinical use of exogenous E2 as a therapeutic agent for cardiovascular disease in women due to the possible risks of thrombotic events, cancers, and arrhythmia are also discussed. Endogenous local E2 biosynthesis from the conversion of testosterone to E2 via aromatase enzyme offers a novel therapeutic paradigm. Targeting specific ERs in the cardiovascular system may result in novel and possibly safer therapeutic options for cardiovascular protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 734 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 734 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 16%
Student > Master 93 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Researcher 42 6%
Other 83 11%
Unknown 285 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 119 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 4%
Other 82 11%
Unknown 299 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 804. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#23,996
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Sex Differences
#2
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406
of 339,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Sex Differences
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them