You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adherence influencing factors – a systematic review of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Public Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2049-3258-72-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Mathes, Thomas Jaschinski, Dawid Pieper |
| Abstract |
Non-adherence is widespread problem. Adherence is a crucial point for the success and the safe use of therapies. The objective of this overview (review of reviews) was to identify factors that influence adherence in chronic physical conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 20% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 86 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 97 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#572
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,768
of 273,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.