↓ Skip to main content

The display effects of patients’ self-assessment on traumatic acute pain on the proportion and timing of analgesics administration in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The display effects of patients’ self-assessment on traumatic acute pain on the proportion and timing of analgesics administration in the emergency department
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12245-014-0036-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nik Hisamuddin NA Rahman, Cecilia Ananthanosamy

Abstract

Acute pain assessment in the emergency department (ED) is important in particular during the triage process. Early pain assessment and management improve outcome. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of documentation and display of patient's self-assessment of pain using numerical rating scale (NRS) on analgesic use among adult trauma patients in ED.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 33%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,788,263
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#415
of 598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,121
of 249,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.