↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of poor outcomes after significant chest trauma in multiply injured patients: a retrospective analysis from the German Trauma Registry (Trauma Register DGU®)

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of poor outcomes after significant chest trauma in multiply injured patients: a retrospective analysis from the German Trauma Registry (Trauma Register DGU®)
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13049-014-0052-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Huber, Peter Biberthaler, Patrick Delhey, Heiko Trentzsch, Hauke Winter, Martijn van Griensven, Rolf Lefering, Stefan Huber-Wagner

Abstract

Blunt thoracic trauma is one of the critical injury mechanisms in multiply injured trauma victims. Although these patients present a plethora of potential structural damages to vital organs, it remains debated which injuries actually influence outcome and thereby should be addressed initially. Hence, the aim of this study was to identify the influence of critical structural damages on mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Unspecified 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2015.
All research outputs
#13,720,149
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#856
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,330
of 237,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.