↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of poor outcomes after significant chest trauma in multiply injured patients: a retrospective analysis from the German Trauma Registry (Trauma Register DGU®)

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of poor outcomes after significant chest trauma in multiply injured patients: a retrospective analysis from the German Trauma Registry (Trauma Register DGU®)
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13049-014-0052-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Huber, Peter Biberthaler, Patrick Delhey, Heiko Trentzsch, Hauke Winter, Martijn van Griensven, Rolf Lefering, Stefan Huber-Wagner

Abstract

Blunt thoracic trauma is one of the critical injury mechanisms in multiply injured trauma victims. Although these patients present a plethora of potential structural damages to vital organs, it remains debated which injuries actually influence outcome and thereby should be addressed initially. Hence, the aim of this study was to identify the influence of critical structural damages on mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
India 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 16%
Student > Postgraduate 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 19 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,293,835
of 5,313,619 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#243
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,364
of 150,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,313,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.