↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy and safety of the Timothy grass allergy sublingual immunotherapy tablet in Canadian adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy and safety of the Timothy grass allergy sublingual immunotherapy tablet in Canadian adults and children
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-10-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacques Hébert, Michael Blaiss, Susan Waserman, Harold Kim, Peter Creticos, Jennifer Maloney, Amarjot Kaur, Ziliang Li, Harold Nelson, Hendrik Nolte

Abstract

The effect of sublingual Timothy grass immunotherapy tablet 2800 BAU (grass SLIT-T) has been evaluated in three North American trials in adults and children who have allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis (AR/C). This paper examines the effects of grass SLIT-T in Canadians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Andorra 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#756
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,975
of 274,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.