↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the primary cilium length: improved method for unbiased high-throughput analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cilia, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring the primary cilium length: improved method for unbiased high-throughput analysis
Published in
Cilia, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13630-016-0028-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anneloes Dummer, Christian Poelma, Marco C. DeRuiter, Marie-José T. H. Goumans, Beerend P. Hierck

Abstract

Primary cilia are cellular protrusions involved in mechanic and chemical sensing on almost all cells of our body. Important signaling pathways, including Hedgehog, TGFβ, and Ca(2+), are linked to cilia and/or cilia function. Cilia can vary in length, which has functional implications. To measure these lengths correctly, a standardized method with high reliability and throughput is required. To date, methods for length measurements in cultured cells after fluorescent staining for ciliary components are error prone with a possible human selection bias, primarily caused by the orientation of cilia with respect of the imaging plane. In tissue sections, accurate measurements become an even larger challenge due to additional random sectioning plane. Cilia can be reconstructed in 3D and measured one by one, but this is a labor-intensive procedure. Therefore, we developed a new, high-throughput method with less selection bias. To identify the optimal type of measurement of straight and relatively short cilia, three methods were compared. The first method is based on maximum intensity projection (MIP), the second method is based on the Pythagorean theorem (PyT), and the third is based on 3D alternative angled slicing (DAAS). We investigated whether cilia visible in the plane of focus ('flat cilia'), and the ones that are angled with respect to the plane of focus are represented differently among the various methods. To test the agreement between the methods, intraclass correlations are calculated. To measure flat cilia, MIP and DAAS provided representative results, with the MIP method allowing for higher throughput. However, when measuring the angled cilia with MIP, the actual cilium length is overtly underestimated. DAAS and PyT are exchangeable methods for length measurements of the angled cilia, while PyT exhibits higher throughput and is therefore the preferred method for measuring the length of an angled cilium. PyT is a universal measuring method to measure straight cilia, without selection bias. MIP provides similar results for flat cilia, but underestimates the length of angled cilia. In addition, PyT facilitates high-throughput length measurements. Manual tracking or reconstruction will be the method of choice to measure irregularly shaped cilia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Bachelor 26 20%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Engineering 9 7%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 22 17%