↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the responsiveness of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index in older people

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the responsiveness of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index in older people
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12955-014-0158-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hylton B Menz, Maria Auhl, Sonja Ristevski, Nicoletta Frescos, Shannon E Munteanu

Abstract

BackgroundIn recent years, several questionnaires have been developed for the assessment of foot health and its impact on quality of life. In order for these tools to be useful outcome measures in clinical trials, their ability to detect change over time (responsiveness) needs to be determined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness of two commonly-used questionnaires in older people with foot pain.MethodsParticipants (n¿=¿59; 24 women and 35 men, mean age [SD] 82.3 [7.8] years) allocated to the intervention arm of a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of extra-depth footwear compared to usual care completed the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) and Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI) at baseline and 16 weeks. Responsiveness of the FHSQ subscales (pain, function, footwear and general foot health) and MFPDI subscales (pain, functional limitation and concern about appearance) was determined using (i) paired t-tests, (ii) Cohen¿s d, (iii) the standardised response mean (SRM), and (iv) the Guyatt index.ResultsOverall, the FHSQ pain subscale exhibited the highest responsiveness, as evidenced by a highly significant paired t-test (p <0.001), Cohen¿s d =0.63 (medium effect size), SRM =0.50 (medium effect size) and Guyatt index =1.70 (huge effect size). The next most responsive measure was the FHSQ function subscale, as evidenced by a borderline paired t-test (p =0.050), Cohen¿s d =0.37 (small effect size), SRM =0.26 (small effect size) and GI =1.22 (very large effect size). The FHSQ footwear, FHSQ general foot health and MFPDI pain, functional limitation and concern about appearance subscales demonstrated lower responsiveness, with negligible to medium effect sizes.ConclusionThe FHSQ pain and function subscales were most responsive to change in older people with foot pain receiving a footwear intervention. These findings provide useful information to guide researchers in selecting appropriate outcome measures for use in future clinical trials of foot disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 35%