↓ Skip to main content

The impact of sex and age on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with targeted temperature management

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of sex and age on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with targeted temperature management
Published in
Critical Care, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1860-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang Hoon Oh, Kyu Nam Park, Jeeyong Lim, Seung Pill Choi, Joo Suk Oh, In Soo Cho, Byung Kook Lee, Yong Hwan Kim, Young-Min Kim, Han Joon Kim, Chun Song Youn, Soo Hyun Kim, On behalf of the Korean Hypothermia Network Investigators

Abstract

There are conflicting data regarding sex-based differences in the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, and whether the specific sex advantage is age-specific remains unclear. We assessed the impact of the interactions between sex and age on the neurological outcomes of OHCA patients receiving targeted temperature management (TTM). Data collected from 2007 to 2012 for a multicenter, registry-based study of the Korean Hypothermia Network were analyzed. We used a multivariate logistic regression model with an interaction term (age × sex) as the final model for the outcomes. To evaluate the association between sex and outcome in specific age groups, all patients were divided into specific age subgroups, and the adjusted ORs and 95% CIs of good neurological outcomes for males were calculated for each age group. Finally, the ORs of a good neurological outcome for the specific age groups compared with the 50- to 59-year-old group were calculated for both sexes. In the interaction analysis, age was a negative prognostic factor (OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]), whereas sex was not associated with neurological outcomes (OR, 3.74 [95% CI, 0.85-16.35]), and reproductive age in females (age, < 50 years) was also not associated with good neurological outcomes. After the patients were divided into five age groups, sex was not an independent predictor of neurological outcomes across all age groups. Patients of both sexes aged < 40 years had significantly better outcomes than patients in the 50- to 59-year-old group (males, OR, 4.03 [95% CI, 1.86-8.73]; females, OR, 10.34 [95% CI, 1.99-53.85]). Males aged ≥ 70 years had significantly poorer neurological outcomes than those in the 50- to 59-year-old group (OR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.07-0.32]), but this outcome was not observed for females (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.20-3.14]). Sex did not influence the neurological outcomes of TTM-treated OHCA patients. In contrast to the outcomes in males, the neurological outcomes of females worsened from 18 to 59 years of age and then remained constant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 18 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 22 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,826,123
of 23,989,841 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,168
of 6,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,548
of 332,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.