↓ Skip to main content

Immigrant women living with HIV in Spain: a qualitative approach to encourage medical follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immigrant women living with HIV in Spain: a qualitative approach to encourage medical follow-up
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Guionnet, Bárbara Navaza, Belén Pizarro de la Fuente, María Jesús Pérez-Elías, Fernando Dronda, Rogelio López-Vélez, José A Pérez-Molina

Abstract

Immigrant women living with HIV generally have worse adherence to medical treatment and follow-up when compared to native women and immigrant or native men. The general aim of this study was to improve healthcare services for HIV-positive women and to better understand why some of them discontinue treatment. The specific objectives were: (1) to explore the barriers and facilitators to medical follow-up among women and (2) to use the findings to create a guide for healthcare professionals with strategies and tools to encourage the immigrant women to continue with their healthcare treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 18%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,341,114
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,448
of 14,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,679
of 260,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#166
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.